Integrity and Authority of the Prosecutor's Role in Enforcing Corruption Crimes
Keywords:
public prosecutor; criminal prosecution; discretionary authorityAbstract
The authors examine issues related to the development of a normative model of the activities of public prosecutors in criminal proceedings and the ways in which such a model can influence the reform of the criminal process as a whole. Objectives: to analyze the impact of the model of the activities of public prosecutors on the successful achievement of the objectives of criminal proceedings and to propose reforms of the criminal justice system. This research uses legal modeling methods, statistical and sociological cognition methods, and legal comparison methods. Results and originality: The originality of the research is demonstrated by the fact that, for the first time, an attempt was made to determine the impact of the public prosecutor's activity model on the direction of criminal justice reform. The results of the study include the identification of the main factors influencing the construction of the legal model of the prosecutor's activity in the field of criminal proceedings, as well as the determination of the directions of influence of the model on the reform of the criminal justice system.
Downloads
References
Abdulkadir Muhammad. Hukum Dan
Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Pt. Citra
Aditya Bakti, 2004.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Beberapa Aspek
Kebijakan Penegakan Dan Pengembangan
Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya
Bakti, 1998.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum
Tata Negara. Jakarta: Pt Rajagrafindo
Persada, 2014.
Atmasasmita, Romli. Sistem Peradilan Pidana
Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana Pernada
Media Group, 2010.
Darmono, B. “Reformasi Hukum Tata Negara
Indonesia: Perubahan Kekuasaan
Eksekutif, Legislatif Dan Yudikatif
Berdasarkan Amandemen Undang-Undang
Dasar 1945.” Jurnal Hukum &
Pembangunan 37, No. 4 (December 21,
: 594.
Hamzah, Andi. Hukum Acara Pidana
Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.
Irvansyah, Afrhezan. “Penegakan Hukum
Pidana Melalui Kebijakan Penghentian
Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan
Restoratif.” Katalog 1, No. 2 (2021): 1–19.
Kansil, C.S.T. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Dan
Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai
Pustaka, 1989.
Lebang, M. A. S., And R. Kastra.
“Perbandingan Antara Peran Jaksa Di
Indonesia Dengan Peran Jaksa Di Daearah
Administrasi Khusus Macao Dalam Sistem
Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan
, No. 2 (November 27, 2021): 1–15.
Marwiyah, S. “Dekonstruksi Akar Korupsi
Dari Pola Kemitraan Antara Jaksa Dengan
Pimpinan Daerah.” Yurispruden 1, No. 1
(January 24, 2018): 47.
Saleh, K., H. Zia, And A. Muflihin. “Kode
Etik Profesi Jaksa Yang Berintegritas
Berdasarkan Perja Nomor: Per-
/A/Ja/07/2007 Ttg Kode Perilaku
Jaksa.” Datin Law Jurnal 1, No. 2 (October
, 2020).
Saputra, D., Kurniawan, A. S. Perdana, And H.
Murbawan. “Peran Jaksa Dalam Sistem
Peradilan Di Indonesia.” Halu Oleo Law Review
, No. 2 (September 29, 2022): 218–37.
Sari, N. M., And I. N. Budiana. “Limitatif
Kewenangan Jaksa Penuntut Umum
Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Kertha
Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum 8, No. 9
(August 17, 2020): 1324.
Satriyo, R. “Peranan Jaksa Dalam Pelaksanaan
Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.” Jurnal
Hukum & Pembangunan 21, No. 1
(February 24, 1991): 17.
Sutrisno, S. “Efektifitas Jaksa Pengacara
Negara Dalam Upaya Pemulihan
Keuangan Negara/Daerah Sebagai Akibat
Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Kejaksaan
Negeri Purwokerto.” Jurnal Idea Hukum 4,
No. 2 (October 17, 2018).
Yulio Mahendra Putra, I. G. N., And I. G. A.
Stefani Ratna Maharani. “Problematika
Kewenangan Dwi Fungsi Jaksa Menangani
Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Prespektif
Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Kertha Semaya :
Journal Ilmu Hukum 10, No. 9 (July 11,
: 2003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
