The Effectiveness of the Prescribed Dose of the Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in Treating Low Grade Glioma
Keywords:
Gamma Knife, Radiosurgery, GKRS, Low Grade Glioma, Glioma, Radiation DoseAbstract
The most prominent form of primary intracerebral tumor is gliomas. Their incidence ranges between 45% and 62% of the population, with a slight prevalence in males (M/F: 1.3). Gliomas are tumors that develop from glial or precursor cells that are neuroectodermal in origin. Gliomas account for 75% of malignant primary brain tumors in adults, with glioblastomas accounting for more than half of glioma. While CNS tumors are rare, they are a significant cause of cancer morbidity and mortality, especially in children and young adults, where they account for roughly 30% and 20% of cancer deaths, respectively. They still have a high death rate compared to other cancers. This benign tumor (WHO Grade I) is mainly found in children and has biological features that differ from diffuse astrocytomas (WHO Grades II-IV). Glioma cells' ability to migrate is a key factor in making glial tumors aggressive. Contrast enhancement cannot distinguish between high- and low-grade gliomas, but low-grade gliomas are considered nonenhancing tumors. Alokaili et al. discovered that 35% of low-grade gliomas improved, while only 16% of high-grade gliomas did not. This study included 75 patients with low-grade glioma; however, due to the spread of Covid-19, some patients were unable to finish the follow-up therefore, they were removed from the total number that became later (31) patients. In the final analysis, (31) people participated in this study, conducted at the Gamma knife center of Neurosciences Hospital, Baghdad/Iraq seven months from June to December, with prescribed doses at 50% from 12Gy to 20Gy. Some patients did the gamma knife radiosurgery before this study begins, but they are included in this study because they are under follow up, and this study needed to do a follow up after one-year post-gamma or more, so will found that there are some of them with a follow up after 2years, 3years post-gamma knife radiosurgery, The follow-up includes MRIs for all patients who were treated at the neuroscience hospital, as well as measurements of tumor size before and after GK for all patients. In all age groups there was a decrease in the average tumor volume after radiosurgery. The highest average tumor volume in the 40-49 age group before radiosurgery. The p-value is significant ≤0.001. The highest rate of improvement in tumor size was in the age group 40-49. The average tumor size in females is greater than the average tumor size in males before radiosurgery. After radiosurgery, the average tumor size in females was lower than in males. The average difference between tumor size before and after GKR and that the rate of decrease in tumor size in females is more than males, p-value was significant (p-value= 0.038)It was found that the tumor volume rates in those who underwent previous surgery were higher than in patients who did not undergo previous surgery. The date of prior surgery is a significant (p-value = 0.046).It is clear that a larger dose was given to patients with a larger tumor size, and that the dose (12 Gy) was the lower effective as the tumor size increased, and the lowest tumor size after radiosurgery was in 2020. That the amount of decrease in tumor size increased relatively with increasing dose, and that the lowest rate of decrease in tumor size was in the lowest dose amount.
Downloads
References
K. Gousias et al., “Descriptive epidemiology
of cerebral gliomas in northwest Greece
and study of potential predisposing factors,
–2007,” Neuroepidemiology, vol. 33,
no. 2, pp. 89–95, 2009.
K.-W. Jung, H. Yoo, H.-J. Kong, Y.-J. Won,
S. Park, and S. H. Lee, “Population-based
survival data for brain tumors in Korea,”
J. Neurooncol., vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 301–
, 2012.
D. Gigineishvili, N. Shengelia, G. Shalashvili,
S. Rohrmann, A. Tsiskaridze, and R.
Shakarishvili, “Primary brain tumour
epidemiology in Georgia: first-year results
of a population-based study,” J.
Neurooncol., vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 241–
, 2013.
Q. T. Ostrom et al., “CBTRUS statistical
report: primary brain and central nervous
system tumors diagnosed in the United
States in 2007–2011,” Neuro. Oncol., vol.
, no. suppl_4, pp. iv1–iv63, 2014.
K. A. Jaeckle et al., “Transformation of low
grade glioma and correlation with
outcome: an NCCTG database analysis,”
J. Neurooncol., vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 253–
, 2011.
J. M. Sarmiento, A. S. Venteicher, and C. G.
Patil, “Early versus delayed postoperative
radiotherapy for treatment of low‐grade
gliomas,” Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,
no. 6, 2015.
A. Bertalanffy et al., “Gamma knife
radiosurgery of acoustic neurinomas,”
Acta Neurochir. (Wien)., vol. 143, no. 7,
pp. 689–695, 2001.
I. Yang et al., “Facial nerve preservation after
vestibular schwannoma Gamma Knife
radiosurgery,” J. Neurooncol., vol. 93, no.
, pp. 41–48, 2009.D. Kaul, V. Budach, L. Graaf, J. Gollrad, and
H. Badakhshi, “Outcome of elderly
patients with meningioma after imageguided stereotactic radiotherapy: a study of
cases,” Biomed Res. Int., vol. 2015,
A. Ö. Börcek et al., “Gamma Knife
radiosurgery for arteriovenous
malformations in pediatric patients,”
Child’s Nerv. Syst., vol. 30, no. 9, pp.
–1492, 2014.
C. J. De Vile et al., “Management of
childhood craniopharyngioma: can the
morbidity of radical surgery be
predicted?,” J. Neurosurg., vol. 85, no. 1,
pp. 73–81, 1996.
H. G. Eder, K. A. Leber, S. Eustacchio, and
G. Pendl, “The role of gamma knife
radiosurgery in children,” Child’s Nerv.
Syst., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 341–346, 2001.
D. A. Larson et al., “Gamma knife for glioma:
selection factors and survival,” Int. J.
Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., vol. 36, no. 5,
pp. 1045–1053, 1996.
M. A. Izard et al., “Volume not number of
metastases: Gamma Knife radiosurgery
management of intracranial lesions from
an Australian perspective,” Radiother.
Oncol., vol. 133, pp. 43–49, 2019.
E. Fokas, M. Henzel, G. Surber, K. Hamm,
and R. Engenhart-Cabillic, “Stereotactic
radiotherapy of benign meningioma in the
elderly: clinical outcome and toxicity in
patients,” Radiother. Oncol., vol. 111,
no. 3, pp. 457–462, 2014.
C. P. Yen, J. Sheehan, M. Steiner, G.
Patterson, and L. Steiner, “Gamma knife
surgery for focal brainstem gliomas,” J.
Neurosurg., vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 8–17,
D.-S. Kong et al., “Long-term efficacy and
tolerability of gamma knife radiosurgery
for growth hormone-secreting adenoma: a
retrospective multicenter study (MERGE-
,” World Neurosurg., vol. 122, pp.
e1291–e1299, 2019.
E. B. Dinca et al., “Survival and
complications following Gamma Knife
radiosurgery or enucleation for ocular
melanoma: a 20-year experience,” Acta
Neurochir. (Wien)., vol. 154, no. 4, pp.
–610, 2012.
B. Karlsson, I. Lax, and M. Söderman,
“Factors influencing the risk for
complications following Gamma Knife
radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous
malformations,” Radiother. Oncol., vol.
, no. 3, pp. 275–280, 1997.
S. C. Bir, S. Ambekar, P. Bollam, and A.
Nanda, “Long-term outcome of gamma
knife radiosurgery for metastatic brain
tumors originating from lung cancer,”
Surg. Neurol. Int., vol. 5, no. Suppl 8, p.
S396, 2014.
D. S. Seneviratne et al., “Intracranial motion
during frameless Gamma-Knife stereotactic
radiosurgery,” J. Radiosurgery SBRT, vol. 6,
no. 4, p. 277, 2020.
G. Pendl, P. Vorkapie, and M. Koniyama,
“Microsurgery of midbrain lesions,”
Neurosurgery, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 641–648,
C. Wang, J. Zhang, A. Liu, B. Sun, and Y.
Zhao, “Surgical treatment of primary
midbrain gliomas,” Surg. Neurol., vol. 53,
no. 1, pp. 41–51, 2000.
I. Fuchs, W. Kreil, B. Sutter, G.
Papaethymiou, and G. Pendl, “Gamma
Knife radiosurgery of brainstem gliomas,”
in Advances in Epilepsy Surgery and
Radiosurgery, Springer, 2002, pp. 85–90.
G. Pendl and P. Vorkapic, “Microsurgery of
intrinsic midbrain lesions,” in Processes of
the Cranial Midline, Springer, 1991, pp.
–143.
R. F. Young, S. Vermulen, and A. Posewitz,
“Gamma knife radiosurgery for the
treatment of trigeminal neuralgia,”
Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg., vol. 70, no.
Suppl. 1, pp. 192–199, 1998.
J. P. Sheehan et al., “Gamma Knife radiosurgery
for sellar and parasellar meningiomas: a
multicenter study,” J. Neurosurg., vol. 120,
no. 6, pp. 1268–1277, 2014.
A. L. Elaimy et al., “Clinical outcomes of
gamma knife radiosurgery in the salvage
treatment of patients with recurrent highgrade glioma,” World Neurosurg., vol. 80,
no. 6, pp. 872–878, 2013.
G. Norén, J. Arndt, and T. Hindmarsh,
“Stereotactic radiosurgery in cases of
acoustic neurinoma: further experiences,”
Neurosurgery, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 12–22,
M. E. Linskey, D. L. Lunsford, and J. C.
Flickinger, “Radiosurgery for acoustic
neurinomas: early experience,”
Neurosurgery, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 736–745,
P. C. Gerszten, D. Adelson, D. Kondziolka,
J. C. Flickinger, and D. Lunsford,
“Seizure outcome in children treated for
arteriovenous malformations using gamma
knife radiosurgery,” Pediatr. Neurosurg.,
vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 139–144, 1996.
B. Sutter and O. Schröttner, Advances in
Epilepsy Surgery and Radiosurgery, vol.
Springer Science & Business Media,
T. Shuto, H. Fujino, H. Asada, S. Inomori,
and H. Nagano, “Gamma knife
radiosurgery for metastatic tumours in the
brain stem,” Acta Neurochir. (Wien)., vol.
, no. 9, pp. 755–760, 2003.
E. Dodoo et al., “Increased survival using
delayed gamma knife radiosurgery for
recurrent high-grade glioma: a feasibility
study,” World Neurosurg., vol. 82, no. 5,
pp. e623–e632, 2014.
S. W. Hwang et al., “Adjuvant Gamma Knife
radiosurgery following surgical resection of
brain metastases: a 9-year retrospective
cohort study,” J. Neurooncol., vol. 98, no.
, pp. 77–82, 2010.
N. Ramakrishna, F. Rosca, S. Friesen, E.
Tezcanli, P. Zygmanszki, and F. Hacker,
“A clinical comparison of patient setup
and intra-fraction motion using framebased radiosurgery versus a frameless
image-guided radiosurgery system for
intracranial lesions,” Radiother. Oncol.,
vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 109–115, 2010.
Y. J. Lim and W. Leem, “Two cases of gamma
knife radiosurgery for low-grade optic
chiasm glioma,” Stereotact. Funct.
Neurosurg., vol. 66, no. Suppl. 1, pp.
–183, 1996.
E. J. S. George, J. Kudhail, J. Perks, and P.
N. Plowman, “Acute symptoms after
gamma knife radiosurgery,” J. Neurosurg.,
vol. 97, no. Supplement 5, pp. 631–634,
S. T. Chao et al., “Prospective study of
the short-term adverse effects of gamma
knife radiosurgery,” Technol. Cancer Res.
Treat., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 117–122, 2012.
J. A. Barcia, J. L. Barcia-Salorio, C. Ferrer, E.
Ferrer, R. Algas, and G. Hernandez,
“Stereotactic radiosurgery of deeply seated
low grade gliomas,” in Advances in
Radiosurgery, Springer, 1994, pp. 58–61.
G. S. Baumann et al., “Gamma knife radiosurgery
in children,” Pediatr. Neurosurg., vol. 24, no.
, pp. 193–201, 1996
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.