Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Among Acute STEMI Cases: Predictors for No Re¬ Flow

Authors

  • Almustafa Hassanain M.S. Abdulameer College of Medicine, University of Babylon, Babylon, Iraq Author
  • Al-Mamoori Ali Jaber Aboob College of Medicine, University of Babylon, Babylon, Iraq Author
  • Aljubawii Ameer Ahmed College of Medicine, University of Babylon, Babylon, Iraq Author
  • Al-Hindy Hayder Abdul-Amir Makki Ass. Prof, College of Pharmacy, University of Babylon, Babylon, Iraq. Author

Keywords:

re-flow, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, PCI, STEMI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Abstract

 Background: no reflow has been recognized as a serious primary percutaneous coronary intervention-associated complication, its incidence is related with poor clinical consequences. The goal of the present research is to evaluate the angiographic and clinical determinants of no-reflow. Methods: The clinical and angiographic characteristics of cases of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at the Shaheedul-Mihrab center between January 2015 and September 2016, were retrospectively evaluated. Results: There were 11.5% no-reflow cases. While diabetes, smoking history, sex category, and infarct location did not affect the probability of no-reflow, a history of hypertension and older age did. A higher syntactic score, a greater thrombus burden, and a low primary TIM I flow were all corelated with no re-flow. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Saad RZ, Shaker AK, Dleikh FS, & Al-Hindy

HA-AM (2020) Is There Any Association

Between Highly Sensitive Creactive Protein

and Dental-status in Ischemic Heart

Diseases? A Comparative Study. Biochemical

& Cellular Archives 20 (2): 6069-6075. URL:

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hayder

-Maki/publication/347318185

Al-Shamma YMH, Alkhafaji AAA, & Al-Hindy

HA-A (2022) Caries burden is associated with

serum uric acid and CRP in patients treated

for acute coronary syndrome. HIV Nursing 12

(2): 050-056. DOI:

http://dx.doi.Org/10.31838/hiv23.02.9

Alhaideri AF, Al-Agam A, Alzughaibi M, AlHindy H, & Mousa M (2022)

Hypovitaminosis D is a biological

vulnerability for depressive symptomsin major

depression at the era of COVID-19 outbreak.

Clinical Schizophrenia & Related Psychoses 5

Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Migliorini A, Moschi G,

Bolognese L et al. (2001) Direct infarct artery

stenting without predilation and no-reflow in

patients with acute myocardial infarction.

American heart journal 142 (4): 684-690.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2001.117778

Aung Naing K, Li L, Su Q, & Wu T (2013)

Adenosine and verapamil for no-reflow during

primary percutaneous coronary intervention

in people with acute myocardial infarction.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev (6): Cd009503.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD0095Q

pub2

Bolognese L, Carrabba N, Parodi G, Santoro

GM, Buonamici P et al. (2004) Impact of

microvascular dysfunction on left ventricular

remodeling and long-term clinical outcome

after primary coronary angioplasty for acute

myocardial infarction. Circulation 109 (9):

-1126. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1161/0LCIR.0000118496.

A7

Chen Y, Wang C, Yang X, Wang L, Sun Z et al.

(2012) Independent no-reflow predictors in

female patients with ST-elevation acute

myocardial infarction treated with primary

percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart and

vessels 27: 243-249. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-011-0144-2

De Luca G, Ernst N, Zijlstra F, Van't Hof AW,

Hoorntje JC et al. (2004) Preprocedural TIMI

flow and mortality in patients with acute

myocardial infarction treated by primary

angioplasty. Journal of the American College

of Cardiology 43 (8): 1363-1367. URL:

https://www jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j jacc.

11.042

Fajar JK, Heriansyah T, & Rohman MS (2018)

The predictors of no reflow phenomenon after

percutaneous coronary intervention in

patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis. Indian Heart

Journal 70: S406-S418. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2018.01.032

Galasso G, Schiekofer S, D’Anna C, Gioia GD,

Piccolo R et al. (2014) No-reflow phenomenon:

pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and

treatment. A review of the current literature and

future perspectives. Angiology 65 (3): 180-189.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1177/0003319712474336

Ghazi HAA-M, Al-Taee RAM, & Al-Hindy HAAM (2020) Immunophenotypic

characterization of malignant lymphoma in

Iraqi patients using immunohistochemical

CD-marker study. Systematic Reviews in

Pharmacy 11 (11): 412-417. DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/srp.2020.lL61

Harrison RW, Aggarwal A, Ou F-s, Klein LW,

Rumsfeld JS et al. (2013) Incidence and outcomes

of no-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous

coronary intervention among patients with acute

myocardial infarction. The American journal of

cardiology 111 (2): 178-184. DOI:

https://doi.Org/10.1016/i.amicard.2012.09.015

Kazaili A, Abdul-Amir Al-Hindy H, Madine J, &

Akhtar R (2021) Nano-scale stiffness and

collagen fibril deterioration: Probing the

cornea following enzymatic degradation using

peakforce-qnm afm. Sensors 21 (5): 1629.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21051629

Keeley EC, Boura JA, & Grines CL (2003) Primary

angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic

therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a

quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. The

lancet 361 (9351): 13-20. DOI:

https://doi.oig/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12113-

Kirma C, Izgi A, Dundar C, Tanalp AC, Oduncu

V et al. (2008) Clinical and procedural

predictors of no-reflow phenomenon after

primary percutaneous coronary interventions

Experience at a Single Center. Circulation

Journal 72 (5): 716-721. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.72.716

Kloner RA, Ganote CE, & Jennings RB (1974)

The “no-reflow” phenomenon after

temporary coronary occlusion in the dog. The

Journal of clinical investigation 54 (6): 1496-

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107898

Messner B, & Bernhard D (2014) Smoking and

cardiovascular disease: mechanisms of endothelial

dysfunction and early atherogenesis. Arteriosclerosis,

thrombosis, and vascular biology 34 (3): 509-515.

DOI:

https://doi.oig/10.1161/ATVBAHA113.300156

Mousa MJ, Al Saffar HS, & Al-Hindy H (2020) Low

Level Laser (Biophotomodulation) Therapy for

the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers with 532

nm KTP Laser Induces Wound Healing,

Fibroblast Proliferation and Over-expression of

TGF-|3. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy 11 (6):

-403. DOI:

https://doi.Org/10.31838/srp.2020.6.63

Niccoli G, Burzotta F, Galiuto L, & Crea F

(2009) Myocardial no-reflow in humans.

Journal of the American College of

Cardiology 54 (4): 281-292. URL:

https://www jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j jacc.

03.054

O’gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey Jr

DE, Chung MK et al. (2013) 2013

ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of

ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive

summary: a report of the American College of

Cardiology Foundation/American Heart

Association Task Force on Practice

Guidelines. Circulation 127 (4): 529-555.

DOI:

https://doi.Org/l0.1161/CIR.ObO13e3182742

c84

Reffemann T, & Kloner RA (2004) Microvascular

alterations after temporary coronary artery

occlusion: the no-reflow phenomenon. Journal of

cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics 9

(3): 163-172. DOI:https://doi.oig/10.1177/107424840400900303

Shaker AK, Al-Saad R, Jasim R, & Al-Hindy HAAM (2020) Biochemical Significance of

Cystatin-C and High-Sensitive CRP in

Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome; any

Clinical Correlation with Diagnosis and

Ejection Fraction. Systematic Reviews in

Pharmacy 11 (3): 301-308. DOI:

http://dx.doi.Org/10.5530/srp.2019.2.04

Sianos G, & Serruys PW (2011) Angiographic

thrombus burden classification in patients

with ST-segment elevation myocardial

infarction treated with percutaneous coronary

intervention. Journal of Invasive Cardiology

(10): 6B-14B. URL:

http://hdl.handle.net/1765/84854

Task Force Members, Steg PG, James SK, Atar

D, Badano LP et al. (2012) ESC Guidelines

for the management of acute myocardial

infarction in patients presenting with STsegment elevation: The Task Force on the

management of ST-segment elevation acute

myocardial infarction of the European Society

of Cardiology (ESC). European heart journal

(20): 2569-2619. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215

Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A, Grines CL,

Zijlstra F et al. (1997) Comparison of primary

coronary angioplasty and intravenous

thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial

infarction: a quantitative review. Jama 278

(23): 2093-2098. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550230

Writing Committee Members, Levine GN, Bates

ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR et al. (2011)

ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for

percutaneous coronary intervention:

executive summary: a report of the American

College of Cardiology Foundation/American

Heart Association Task Force on Practice

Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular

Angiography and Interventions. Circulation

(23): 2574-2609. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823a5

Yang L, Cong H, Lu Y, Chen X, & Liu Y (2020)

Prediction of no-reflow phenomenon in

patients treated with primary percutaneous

coronary intervention for ST-segment

elevation myocardial infarction. Medicine 99

(26). DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020

Downloads

Published

2023-02-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hassanain M.S. Abdulameer , A., Ali Jaber Aboob , A.-M., Ameer Ahmed , A., & Hayder Abdul-Amir Makki , A.-H. (2023). Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Among Acute STEMI Cases: Predictors for No Re¬ Flow. History of Medicine, 9(1). http://13.200.237.241/HOM/index.php/medicine/article/view/496