Judicial Review on Civil Dispute Resolution Through Mediation in Connection with the Mahkamah Agun Regulation Number 1 Of 2016 Concerning Mediation Procedures in Bandung State Court Class Ia.
Keywords:
dispute, civil, mediationAbstract
Mediation provides a method for disputing parties to implement their own choices, accompanied by care and effort to improve their thinking in order to produce a favorable decision for both parties by taking control of their lives in resolving the disputes they face. Various judicial efforts in Indonesia to bridge the issue of civil dispute resolution through mediation can still be considered insufficient. The issues to be discussed in this study are the position of the peace agreement as the basis of mediation and several obstacles in mediation. According to Article 1 number 10 of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in the Judiciary, a peace agreement is a document that contains the content of the peace settlement and the judge's decision that reinforces the peace agreement. If the disputing parties reconcile and then request the court to strengthen the peace agreement with a court decision, this agreement is called a peace agreement. The peace agreement is just one form of the outcomes of mediation. Mediation itself is based on negotiation and agreement between the parties involved in the conflict, not on specific legal documents. Therefore, mediation can take place without producing a peace agreement, depending on the decisions of the parties involved. Obstacles in undergoing the mediation procedure carried out by the parties in the District Court as well as the Supreme Court. One of the main obstacles in mediation is the disagreement between the parties involved in the dispute. If one or both parties are unwilling to participate in mediation or do not have a sincere intention to reach an agreement, the mediation process can become difficult or even unproductive.
Downloads
References
Amarini. Penyelesaian Sengketa Yang Efektif Dan Efisien Melalui Optimalisasi Mediasi di Pengadilan. Kosmik Hukum. 2016.
Haerani, R. Tinjauan Yuridis Perjanjian Perdamaian Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan Melalui Proses Negosiasi. Unizar Law Review, 2020.
https://www.pn- bandung.go.id/index.php?id=1327
Jimmy Joses Sembiring, Cara Menyelesaikan Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan, Visi Media, Jakarta, 2011.
Kusen, S. A. (2016). Hakekat Keberadaan Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Pengadilan Negeri. Lex Crimen.
M. Yahya Harahap, Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan,Penyitaan, Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan, Cet. VII, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008).
Made Widnyana, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Indonesia Business Law Center, Jakarta. 2017.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Buku Tanya dan Jawab Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Pelaksanaan Mediasi.
Manan, Bagir, Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Jakarta: Varia Peradilan, 2006.
Mulyana, D. Kekuatan Hukum Hasil Mediasi Di Dalam Pengadilan Dan Di Luar Pengadilan Menurut Hukum Positif. Wawasan Yuridika, 2019.
Nurrachman, Keadilan Sosial: Upaya Mencari Makna Kesejahteraan Bersama di Indonesia, Jakarta: Kompas. 2014.
Rahmadi, T. Mediasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat. Rajawali Pers. 2017.
Rahmah, D. M. Optimalisasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi Di Pengadilan. Bina Mulia Hukum. 2019.
Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: UI-Press, 2010).
Soerjono Soekanto, Sosiologi suatu Pengantar, Rajawali, Jakarta, 2008.
Sudikno mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Edisi VII, Yogyakarta, Liberty, 2006.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, SH. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Edisi ke empat, Yogyakarta:liberty, 2008.
Syoifulloh Arief, I. Optimalisasi Peran Hakim Dalam Upaya Perdamaian Di Persidangan. Dir. Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama. 2020. Syahrizal Abbas, Mediasi dalam Hukum Syariah, Hukum Adat dan Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.
Syahrizal Abbas, Mediasi, Kencana, Cetakan II, Jakarta. 2009.
Yahya Harahap, Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika. 2016.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
