The development of the system of clinical obstetrics in Russia (from the late eighteenth to the early twentieth century)*

Authors

  • Natalia A. Mitsyuk FSBEI HE SSMU MOH Russia 28 Krupskoy St., Smolensk 214019, Russia Author
  • Natalia L. Pushkareva IEA RAS 32a Leninsky ave., Moscow 119334, Russia Author

Keywords:

history of obstetrics, history of midwifery, clinical obstetrics, history of childbirth, maternity shelter, birthing culture

Abstract


This article examines the specific features of the development of clinical obstetrics in Russia from the late eighteenth to the early twentieth century. The research is based on statistical data on the birth rate, reporting material from inpa-tient maternity facilities and ethnographic information on birthing culture, and uses approaches and methods from the anthropology of gender, women’s history, and modern social history (including the concept of medicalisation).
e show that the emergence of clinical obstetrics in Russia was linked to the development of medical science and the need for doctors to gain practical skills in midwifery. With obstetrics a taboo subject and childbirth still a “woman’s space” within popular midwifery, physicians trained in theory were unable to test out their knowledge in practice.
he first maternity clinics were founded in the biggest Russian cities, with universities, in the second half of the eigh-teenth century, and became not just a means of assisting poor women, but also educational and experimental spaces for obstetrics. The development of clinical obstetrics in the provinces in the second half of the nineteenth century was influenced by the rural and urban reforms. By the start of the twentieth century, there was a significant gulf in attitudes to assistance at childbirth: in the capital, hospital births began to prevail over home births, while traditional midwifery clung on in the provinces, where generally births took place in inpatient facilities hospitals only in patho-logical cases. During this period, various types of obstetrics institutes emerged, even including ones owned by private individuals. A significant proportion of the funding for inpatient maternity facilities came from public donations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akushersko-ginekologicheskie uchrezhdeniya Rossii

[Obstetric and gynecological institutions in Russia]

(1910) Saint Petersburg. 328 p. (In Russ.)

Blokhina NN (2008) K istorii rodovspomozheniya v

Sankt-Peterburge (vtoraya polovina XIX– nachalo

XX veka) [To the history of obstetrics in Saint Petersburg (the second half of the 19th to the early 20th

century)]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya [Obstetrics and

gynecology] 5: 66–68. (In Russ.)

Davis-Floyd RE (1994) The technocratic body: American childbirth as cultural expression. Social Science

and Medicine 38(8): 1125–1140. DOI: 10.1016/0277-

(94)90228-3

Dobronravov VA (1886) Otchet lechebnitsy doktora

meditsiny i akushera V.A. Dobronravova [Report of

the hospital of Doctor of Medicine and obstetrician

V.A. Dobronravov]. Kiev: Univ. tip. 159 p. (In Russ.)

Dvadtsat pyat let deyatelnosti Mariinskogo rodovspomogatelnogo doma (1870–1895) [Twenty five years of activity of the Mariinsky maternity hospital (1870‒1895)]

(1895) Saint Petersburg: Gub. tip. 56 p. (In Russ.)

Foucault M (1973) The Birth of the Clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. London: Tavistock Publications. 215 p.

Gorodskie rodilnye priyuty v S.-Peterburge v 1868–

gg. [City maternity shelters in St. Petersburg in

‒1885] (1887) Saint Petersburg: Tip. Shredera.

p. (In Russ.)

Gruzdev SA (1898) Istoricheskiy ocherk kafedry akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney Imperatorskoy voenno-meditsinskoy akademii i soedinennoy s neyu

akademicheskoy akushersko-ginekologicheskoy kliniki

[Historical essay of the Department of Obstetrics and

Women’s Diseases of the Imperial Military Medical

Academy and the associated academic obstetric and

gynecological clinic]. Saint Petersburg: Tip. P.P. Soykina. (In Russ.)

Jakovenko TG (2013) Ohrana materinstva i mladenchestva v Sankt-Peterburge [Protection of motherhood and

infancy in Saint Petersburg]. Saint Petersburg: Lambert. 304 p. (in Russ.)

Kakushkin NM (1917) Novye puti v dele rodovspomozheniya v gor. Saratove [New ways in the case of

maternity care in Saratov]. Ohrana materinstva i mladenchestva [Protection of motherhood and infancy]

: 145–170. (In Russ.)

Leavitt JW (1986) Brought to Bed: Childbearing in America 1750–1950. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 304 p.

Mitsyuk NA, Pushkareva NL, Belova AV (2019) The history of childbirth as the subject of social and humanitarian studies in Russia. History of Medicine 6(3):

–157. DOI: 10.17720/2409-5834.v6.3.2019.04d

Mitsyuk NA, Pushkareva NL (2015) Domashnie rody v

rossiyskikh dvoryanskikh semyakh (konets 19 ‒ nachalo 20 v.) [Home childbirth in Russian noble families

(late 19th ‒ early 20th centuries)]. Etnograficheskoe

obozrenie [Ethnographic review] 5: 167–183. (In

Russ.)

Mitsyuk NA, Pushkareva NL, Ostapenko VM (2017) The

emergence of professional obstetric aid in Smolensk

province in the 19th–early 20th century. History of

Medicine 4(4): 359–373. DOI: 10.17720/2409-5834.

v4.4.2017.06f

Otchet akusherskoy shkoly i rodovspomogatelnogo i

zhenskogo otdeleniy pri ney doktora V.A. Brodskogo

za 1910–1911 gg. [Report of the obstetric school and

the maternity and women’s departments under it by

doctor V.A. Brodsky for 1910‒1911] (1911) Moscow.

p. (In Russ.)

Otchety rodovspomogatelnykh uchrezhdeniy, nahodyashchihsya v vedenii Moskovskogo gorodskogo obshchestvennogo upravleniya za 1914 g. [Reports of

obstetric institutions under the jurisdiction of the

Moscow City Public Administration for 1914] (1914)

Moscow: Gor. tip. 253 p. (In Russ.)

Rein GE (1906) Rodovspomozhenie v Rossii: Sbornik

dokladov na IX Pirogovskom syezde [Maternity care

in Russia. Collection of reports at the 9th PirogovCongress]. Saint Petersburg: Tip. Ministerstva putey

soobshcheniya. 144 p. (In Russ.)

Sto let deyatelnosti Imperatorskogo klinicheskogo povivalnogo instituta (1797–1897) [One hundred years of

activity of the Imperial Clinical Midwifery Institute

(1797‒1897)] (1898) Ed. D. Ott. Saint Petersburg: Gos.

tip. 1281 p. (In Russ.)

Vrachebnye i sanitarnye uchrezhdeniya gor. Sankt-Peterburga [Medical and sanitary institutions in St. Petersburg] (1910) Saint Petersburg: Gor. tip. 66 p. (In Russ.)

Published

2021-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A. Mitsyuk, N., & L. Pushkareva, N. (2021). The development of the system of clinical obstetrics in Russia (from the late eighteenth to the early twentieth century)*. History of Medicine, 7(2). http://13.200.237.241/HOM/index.php/medicine/article/view/290