On the history of the ban on abortion in the USSR: the views of the authorities and Soviet public opinion from the perspective of bioethics (1935–1936)*
Keywords:
history of medicine, bioethics, abortion ban, USSR, Stalinism, Soviet health careAbstract
This article looks at the debate in the USSR in 1935–1936 on banning abortions. This episode of Soviet history has enormous heuristic potential for researchers studying the Soviet period. At first sight, the bill to ban abortions appears simply a matter of historical medical fact, based on which we can in many ways draw conclusions about the situation in healthcare in general, and in obstetrics and gynaecology in particular. However, this small-scale episode in the history of Soviet healthcare provides scope for substantial cross-disciplinary research prospects in fields such as anthropology, sociology, political science, and so on, significantly expanding the research horizons of the Soviet past. Our analysis of the abortion ban debate draws on two groups of sources. The first comprises documents of the highest Communist Party and government bodies, stored in the thematic files of the Soviet Po-litburo. Particular attention is paid to the notes and marginalia made by Stalin in the drafts of the law to ban abortions. Practically all the materials in this group have been officially declassified only comparatively recently, and now being studied for the first time.
he second group of sources comprises letters from members of the Soviet public to the highest organs of government and to na-tional and local periodicals. The letters present a wide range of opinions and observations on the bill to ban abortions. Comparing these two groups of sources has allowed us to become the first Russian researchers to study the development of ethical discourse,and show the history of the emergence of bioethical discourse, in the Soviet period.
Downloads
References
Clements BE (2012) A History of Women in Russia. From Earliest Times
to the Present. Bloomington-Indianapolis.
Conze S (1998) Weder Emanzipation noch Tradition. Stalinistische
Frauenpolitik in den vierziger Jahren. Stalinismus. Neue Forschun-
gen und Konzepte. Berlin.
Denisov BP, Sakevich VI (2014) Ocherk istorii kontrolya rozhdaemo-
sti v Rossii: bluzhdayushchaya demograficheskaya politika [Essay
on the history of birth control in Russia: wandering demographic
policy]. Demograficheskie issledovaniya [Demographic Studies] 23:
–208. (In Russ.)Engel BA (2004) Women in Russia, 1700–2000. New York.
Glass BL, Stolee MK (1987) Family Law in Soviet Russia, 1917–1945.
Journal of Marriage and the Family 49.
Heer DM (1965) Abortion, Contraception, and Population Policy in the
Soviet Union. Soviet Studies 17.
Isupov VA (2000) Demograficheskie katastrofy i krizisy v Rossii v pervoy
polovine XX veka [Demographic disasters and crises in Russia in the
first half of the 20th century]. Novosibirsk. (In Russ.)
Isupov VA (2002) Demograficheskaya politika stalinskogo pravitelstva.
Konets 1920-kh – 1940-e gg. [e demographic policy of the Stalinist
government. Late 1920s – 1940s]. Ural i Sibir v stalinskoy politike
[Ural and Siberia in the Stalinist politics]. Novosibirsk. P. 31–45. (In
Russ.)
Isupov VA (2018) Sotsialnye i prirodnye faktory demograficheskoy
katastrofy v Zapadnoy Sibiri (nachalo 1930-kh gg.) [Social and
natural factors of the demographic catastrophe in Western Siberia
(early 1930s)]. Istoricheskiy kurier [Historical Courier] 1. Electron-
ic resource. Access mode: http://istkurier.ru/data/2018/ISTKURI-
ER-2018-1-11.pdf. (In Russ.)
Kaminsky L (2011) Utopian Visions of Family Life in the Stalin-Era So-
viet Union. Central European History 44.
Khoffmann DL (2018) Vzrashchivanie mass. Modernoe gosudarstvo i
sovetskiy sotsializm [e cultivation of the masses. Modern state and
Soviet socialism. 1914–1939]. 1914–1939. Moscow. (In Russ.)
Kornilov GE (2014) Evolyutsiya mladencheskoy smertnosti na Urale v
pervoy polovine XX v. [e evolution of infant mortality in the Urals
in the first half of the 20th century]. Uralskiy istoricheskiy vestnik
[Ural historical journal] 3. (In Russ.)Lebina NB (2016) Sovetskaya povsednevnost: Normy i anomalii. Ot
voennogo kommunizma k bolshomu stilyu [Soviet daily life: Norms
and anomalies. From war communism to great style]. Moscow. (In
Russ.)
Nakachi M (2006) Population, Politics and Reproduction. Late Stalinism
and its Legacy. Late Stalinist Russia. Society between Reconstruction
and Reinvention. Ed. Fürst J. New York.
Nakachi M (2010) “Abortion is Killing us”. Women’s Medicine and the
Dilemmas for Postwar Doctors in the Soviet Union, 1944–48. Soviet
Medicine. Culture, Practice, and Science. Ed. Bernstein F.L., Burton
C., Healey D. DeKalb.
Nakachi M (2011) A Postwar Sexual Liberation? e Gendered Expe-
rience of the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. Cahiers du Monde
russe 52 (2–3).
Palgrave Handbook on Women and Gender in Twentieth-Century
(2017). Ed. Ilič M. Russia, Basingstoke.
Sobranie postanovleniy i rasporyazheniy SNK SSSR ot 1935 g. [Collec-
tion of decrees and orders of the Council of People’s Commissars of
the USSR from 1935].
Solomon SG (1992) e Demographic Argument in Soviet Debates over
the Legalization of Abortion in the 1920s. Cahiers du Monde russe
et soviétique 33(1).
Zhiromskaya VB (2018) Demograficheskaya kharakteristika ekonomi-
cheski aktivnogo naseleniya RSFSR v 1920-e – seredine 1930-kh gg.
[Demographic characteristics of the economically active population
of the RSFSR in the 1920s – mid-1930s]. Obshchestvo: filosofiya,
istoriya, kultura [Society: philosophy, history, culture] 4: 66–70. (In
Russ.)
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
