On the periodization of the history of medicine and scientific revolutions in medicine in the 17th–21st centuries
Keywords:
periodization, history of medicine, the scientific revolutionAbstract
This article expresses and explains the author’s point of view on the periodization of the history of medicine from the 17th to the 21st century. To substantiate his view the author cites the main results of his study on the history of medicine in the Modern and Contemporary eras, which is based on the use of the philosophical-methodological concept of the structure and dynamics of scientific knowledge developed by V.S. Stepin for analyzing the history of medicine. The study showed that the historical process of the development of medicine from the 17th to the 21st century did not have a linear evolution related to the gradual increase of knowledge about the human organism and human diseases. In this period there were many cases in which the development of medicine was impossible without a radical review of the entire system of ideas on the subject of this scientific-practical activity and the methods for understanding it. These situations occurred either as a result of a systemic crisis related to the inner development of medicine itself or due to the influence of other fields of knowledge, which stimulated the study of phenomena that earlier doctors did not pay attention to. The scientific revolutions served as a way out of these situations. Each revolution led to a radical review of the ideas on the foundations of the biological process, the causes and essences of diseases and the approach to diagnosing and treating human sickness.
It is known for a fact that between the 17th and 21st centuries there were five disciplinary scientific revolutions, three of which were global and two ‒ local. We will uncover the mechanisms of each scientific revolution and look at the results of the historical reconstruction of the reality, ideals, norms for the doctors’ research activity and the philosophical foundations of medical science that accompanied these scientific revolutions.
Based on these results, the author proposes to distinguish five separate stages in the history of medicine in the Modern and Contemporary eras, each of which corresponds to one of the five scientific revolutions that took place in this period.
Downloads
References
Balalykin D.A. O probleme periodizatsii istorii meditsiny
[On the problem of periodization in the history of medicine].
Istoriya meditsiny (History of Medicine). 2016; 3(3):
–264. (in Russian)
Stepin V.S. Istoriya i filosofiya nauki [History and
philosophy of science]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt,
(in Russian)
Stepin V.S., Stochik A.M., Zatravkin S.N. K istorii
stanovleniya neklassicheskogo estestvoznaniya:
revolyutsiya v meditsine kontsa XIX stoletiya [On the history
of the formation of non-classical science: a revolution in
medicine at the end of the XIX century]. Voprosy filosofii.
; 5: 16–29. (in Russian)
Stochik A.M., Zatravkin S.N. Formirovanie
estestvennonauchnyh osnov meditsiny v protsesse
nauchnykh revolyutsiy 17–19 vekov [The formation of
natural science foundations of medicine in the process
of scientific revolutions of the 17th to 19th centuries].
Moscow: Shiko, 2011. (in Russian)
Stepin V.S., Stochik A.M., Zatravkin S.N. Istoriya i
filosofiya meditsiny: nauchnye revolyutsii XVII–XIX vekov
[History and philosophy of medicine: the scientific
revolutions of the XVII–XIX centuries]. Moscow:
Akademicheskiy proekt, 2017. (in Russian)
Stochik A.M., Zatravkin S.N. Nauchnaya revolutsiya
v meditsine posledney chetverti XIX – pervoy poloviny
XX veka. Soobshchenie 3. Ot K. Bernara do U. Kennona:
utverzhdenie novoy kartiny issleduemoy real’nosti [The
scientific revolution in medicine in the last quarter of the
th ‒ the first half of the 20th centuries. Part 3. From Claude
Bernard to Walter Cannon: approval of a new picture of
reality]. Problemy sotsial’noi gigieny, zdravookhraneniya
i istorii meditsiny. 2015; 3: 48‒53. (in Russian)
Stepin V.S., Zatravkin S.N. Nauchnaya revolutsiya v
meditsine vtoroy poloviny XX – nachala XXI veka:
vozniknovenie novyh predstavleniy ob organizme
cheloveka i sushchnosti bolezney [The scientific revolution
in medicine in the second half of the 20th – early 21st
centuries: the emergence of new ideas about the human
organism and essence of diseases]. Problemy social’noi
gigieny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny. 2016; 4:
‒252. (in Russian)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
